• Registration is now open. It usually takes me a couple of hours or less to validate accouts. If you are coming over from VoD or DR and use the same user name I'll give you Adult access automatically. Anybody else I will contact by DM about Adult access.

Waiting.

Otto Von Herunterhängen said:
Why is she mad at her twin sister? :p
Click to expand...
I don't know either. Maybe it's a typical AI self-runner. :rolleyes:

I entered the following prompt, translated from German: “The woman is angry, waving her arms and shouting at an invisible person standing opposite her.”

I had activated the “Audio” button. The text is not mine. It has been adapted by the AI to a possible situation and translates roughly as follows:
“How dare you talk to me like that? I won't tolerate this ever again! Get out of here right now!”

I think the result is amazing. Even in the background, you can see some traffic through the car windows. You can see a moving car and people moving around. What is derived from a single prompt and reproduced in a clip with audio is very amazing. However, I don't know if I will pursue this further. :unsure:
 
The film is really good. I haven't heard of Adobe Firefly yet. But it seems simple. I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the tip.
The woman waiting seems to be a real bitch. The lip-syncing is very good. At least, I think so.
The picture looks very good, by the way. The HDRI in the background must be something in Hamburg. City hall square or something like that. I think I have that HDRI.
 
Daemonium said:
But first I need to read up on whether you can make NSFW films there
Click to expand...
I looked at the terms and conditions. It's not suitable for my genre. Essentially, you're not allowed to show any pornographic images, violence, blood, etc. That's a shame. I really liked this short video. So also non "NSFW".
 
I love the results, even though I don't speak German, LOL Yeah, most AI animation apps don't allow for NSFW prompts and results. Your best bet is WAN 2.5 at Higgsfield.ai which does, but it's a bit expensive. If you have a powerful system, you can d/l the stand alone version of WAN and make your own
 
artur-ae said:
I looked at the terms and conditions. It's not suitable for my genre. Essentially, you're not allowed to show any pornographic images, violence, blood, etc. That's a shame. I really liked this short video. So also non "NSFW".
Click to expand...
Thanks for the information. Then I don't need to look it up myself.
MCDesigns said:
Your best bet is WAN 2.5 at Higgsfield.ai which does, but it's a bit expensive. If you have a powerful system, you can d/l the stand alone version of WAN and make your own
Click to expand...
Thanks for the tip. I'll take a look at WAN.
 
Now if you want to run this on your own PC you can do it on a RTX 5090 but the memory isn't quite up to the full requirements and you have to do some offloading. Seriously. WAN 2.2 does run on 80GB of VRAM, and that is commercially available, for around $8- $10K I present the RTS 6000 Pro

Start saving your pennies. Oh wait, they don't make those anymore. Better make it nickles. Or whatever the local currency is ;)
 
MCDesigns said:
Your best bet is WAN 2.5 at Higgsfield.ai which does, but it's a bit expensive.
Click to expand...
I found this in the Higgsfield.AI Terms.

Quote:
5.3. Inappropriate Content.
Furthermore, Your Content may not contain nudity, biometric data, violence, be sexually explicit, harmful, hateful, harassing, or offensive as determined by Company in its sole discretion. You may not upload or Make Available an image of another person without that person’s permission or otherwise sufficient rights to do so. The rights granted to you in this Agreement are subject to your compliance with the restrictions set forth in this section. Any unauthorized use of the Service terminates the licenses granted by Company pursuant to this Agreement.
Quote end.

What is your opinion or experience on this? Does this apply in general? Or only to content published in the community? Do you use WAN2.5 at Higgsfield?
 
Daemonium said:
I found this in the Higgsfield.AI Terms.

Quote:
5.3. Inappropriate Content.
Furthermore, Your Content may not contain nudity, biometric data, violence, be sexually explicit, harmful, hateful, harassing, or offensive as determined by Company in its sole discretion. You may not upload or Make Available an image of another person without that person’s permission or otherwise sufficient rights to do so. The rights granted to you in this Agreement are subject to your compliance with the restrictions set forth in this section. Any unauthorized use of the Service terminates the licenses granted by Company pursuant to this Agreement.
Quote end.

What is your opinion or experience on this? Does this apply in general? Or only to content published in the community? Do you use WAN2.5 at Higgsfield?
Click to expand...
It's what I am using for my animations if i want sound, otherwise I am using NIM online, but NIM only gives me NSFW content with WAN 2.2, not 2.5. That is probably just a disclaimer to appease the censor idiots online. I saw a video on YT that showcased using WAN 2.5 at Higgsfield specifically for NSFW content which is why I tried it and haven't had any issues yet.
It will tell you when you try to generate if the generator doesn't allow NSFW prompts. I had seen they had an uncensored version of SORA 2 also, but haven't got that to work yet
 
MCDesigns said:
It's what I am using for my animations if i want sound, otherwise I am using NIM online, but NIM only gives me NSFW content with WAN 2.2, not 2.5. That is probably just a disclaimer to appease the censor idiots online. I saw a video on YT that showcased using WAN 2.5 at Higgsfield specifically for NSFW content which is why I tried it and haven't had any issues yet.
It will tell you when you try to generate if the generator doesn't allow NSFW prompts. I had seen they had an uncensored version of SORA 2 also, but haven't got that to work yet
Click to expand...
Thank you for your detailed reply. I thought it would all be a little less complicated. That you could take a test at least once without registering. I need to think carefully about whether I need it at all. I'm not taking many pictures at the moment. It's a little too expensive for one or two clips a month. Thanks again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top