Your argument about big brand AI is totally irrelevant to the point I made. I'm not talking over you, you are talking past me.
It is relevant because I'm simply not that optimistic.
This thread is about Adobe and "alternatives". To summarize my entire point about this thing: Adobe is a monopoly not because it ever was the best or anyone liked it the most, but because it became the default, the de facto standard and the cozy go-to, because it's a recognisable brand that everyone uses.
The same thing is with anything Apple, Google, Microsoft, and that's just the tech brands.
Is Chrome the best browser? No, it literally offers no advantages over many others. Shit, most browsers use the exact same engine and thus are 100% compatible. So why people use Chrome? Because they know it. And once the normie consumer knows something, they'll keep using it forever, and the power of that thing keeps growing until it becomes the monopoly and they can do anything they want. Fill up the thing with spyware, block all adblockers, doesn't matter. The normie is caught in the net.
I also argued that if someone can jump from Adobe to this vibecoded Craft thingy, it means they could've switched to something else ages ago. Most don't, because reasons.
I'm simply not optimistic that we'll suddenly get into some software utopia just because more software becomes available. We're still the same dumb human species with attention span of a goldfish that jumps at shiny thing. There will always be commercial pressures for enshittification, for some solution to become the monopolistic de facto standard, and there will always be the vast majority of users that will use the default thing regardless of how good or shit it is.
Even if Photoshop or something gets replaced as the default, or even the entire paradigm of software gets turned on its head, doesn't mean it's all suddenly gonna be all bright and open source, because you'd need to change the entire concept of human civilisation for that to take effect.